List of Journal Publications
2015
1.
Gao, Y. F., Larson, B. C., Lee, J. H., Nicola, L., Tischler, J. Z., Pharr, G. M., Huan, Yonggang
Lattice rotation patterns and strain gradient effects in face-centered-cubic single crystals under spherical indentation Journal Article
In: JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS, vol. 82, no. 6, 2015.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: Indentation size effects, Lattice misorientation, Strain gradient crystal plasticity | Links:
@article{Gao2015,
title = {Lattice rotation patterns and strain gradient effects in face-centered-cubic single crystals under spherical indentation},
author = {Y. F. Gao and B. C. Larson and J. H. Lee and L. Nicola and J. Z. Tischler and G. M. Pharr and Yonggang Huan},
doi = {10.1115/1.4030403},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS},
volume = {82},
number = {6},
publisher = {American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)},
abstract = {Strain gradient effects are commonly modeled as the origin of the size dependence of material strength, such as the dependence of indentation hardness on contact depth and spherical indenter radius. However, studies on the microstructural comparisons of experiments and theories are limited. First, we have extended a strain gradient Mises-plasticity model to its crystal plasticity version and implemented a finite element method to simulate the load-displacement response and the lattice rotation field of Cu single crystals under spherical indentation. The strain gradient simulations demonstrate that the forming of distinct sectors of positive and negative angles in the lattice rotation field is governed primarily by the slip geometry and crystallographic orientations, depending only weakly on strain gradient effects, although hardness depends strongly on strain gradients. Second, the lattice rotation simulations are compared quantitatively with micron resolution, three-dimensional X-ray microscopy (3DXM) measurements of the lattice rotation fields under 100mN force, 100 mu m radius spherical indentations in < 111 >, < 110 >, and < 001 > oriented Cu single crystals. Third, noting the limitation of continuum strain gradient crystal plasticity models, two-dimensional discrete dislocation simulation results suggest that the hardness in the nanocontact regime is governed synergistically by a combination of strain gradients and source-limited plasticity. However, the lattice rotation field in the discrete dislocation simulations is found to be insensitive to these two factors but to depend critically on dislocation obstacle densities and strengths.},
keywords = {Indentation size effects, Lattice misorientation, Strain gradient crystal plasticity},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Strain gradient effects are commonly modeled as the origin of the size dependence of material strength, such as the dependence of indentation hardness on contact depth and spherical indenter radius. However, studies on the microstructural comparisons of experiments and theories are limited. First, we have extended a strain gradient Mises-plasticity model to its crystal plasticity version and implemented a finite element method to simulate the load-displacement response and the lattice rotation field of Cu single crystals under spherical indentation. The strain gradient simulations demonstrate that the forming of distinct sectors of positive and negative angles in the lattice rotation field is governed primarily by the slip geometry and crystallographic orientations, depending only weakly on strain gradient effects, although hardness depends strongly on strain gradients. Second, the lattice rotation simulations are compared quantitatively with micron resolution, three-dimensional X-ray microscopy (3DXM) measurements of the lattice rotation fields under 100mN force, 100 mu m radius spherical indentations in < 111 >, < 110 >, and < 001 > oriented Cu single crystals. Third, noting the limitation of continuum strain gradient crystal plasticity models, two-dimensional discrete dislocation simulation results suggest that the hardness in the nanocontact regime is governed synergistically by a combination of strain gradients and source-limited plasticity. However, the lattice rotation field in the discrete dislocation simulations is found to be insensitive to these two factors but to depend critically on dislocation obstacle densities and strengths.
